TradingView
TheAnonymousBanker
2018年2月22日下午4點30分

[BTCUSD] BUY WAVE (V)? 看多

Bitcoin / U.S. dollarBitstamp

描述

Technical Analysis on daily time frame... You will find our updates on intraday chart below.

If you think this analysis can be useful, leave a your comment or your LIKE!
Thank you for support and trade with care!

評論

As the price of bitcoin has increased closer to $12,000 from early-February lows, associated transaction fees have gotten smaller, according to Credit Suisse. It's a reversal of the trend seen in the last half of 2017, when transaction fees shot up as bitcoin increased in price.

"While this is only a two-week retracement, and continued price appreciation could still cause an increase in fees, this early indication is somewhat contrary to what we would have expected given past trends," Credit Suisse wrote.

評論

Good morning Traders,
this was our last published idea (on TradingView) about bitcoin. Thanks to the Traders who supported our bitcoin ideas.
(Instead we will continue to follow crypto currencies in our blog)

Have a nice weekend!!!

評論

評論

[BTCUSD] BUY WAVE (V)? ...at the moment, no!
評論
antikseremoni
Don't leave man..I love your ideas of btc.. Give us your btc adress. We can donate for your company.
ArShevelev
why you started counting (i-ii-iii-iv-v) from 20k, if so, we should be in wave A of grand supercycle?
angel_lobs
@a.shevelev002, Was just thinking the same!
TheAnonymousBanker
@a.shevelev002, From our point of view, there are still no elements to support that at the moment, but it can happen in the future ...
angel_lobs
@SignalSwiss, I did not understand your reply, on the correction waves the "Big" wave A and C both have 5 sub waves, and wave C only has 3. The i-ii-iii-iv-v waves you drew suggest that wave A (because those 5 sub waves make wave A) by it self will go to 3k, which I do not understand. On top of that inside those 5 subwaves you have a few ABC there that are kind of random.
angel_lobs
@angel_lobs, and wave B only has 3*
Acel
@a.shevelev002, Because it can be a part of a bigger ABC. Still a valid count.
ArShevelev
@Acel, if so, we should expect completing wave C at retest of 2013 high - 1200$
Acel
@a.shevelev002, if his scenario is correct, next targets for a bounce are 6.3k 3.1k and the extreme of 1.1k.

1:1 usually has more chances so 3.1k is more likely in his wave count, as shown in the original idea. Also, there is major support down there.
ArShevelev
更多