This is Part 20 of my theoretical geometricc linear regression modeling from 3.22.18, "Bitcoin to C". The modeling sequence starts at Model A, and runs thru Model M. Model M is the newest Model. Each model is strictly built off of the preceding model's geometricc regression points. The regression points from each model, creates a geometricc pattern of indicators in various forms, that can be read to PREDICT future trend movement, before traditional indicators appear.
The idea here is to convince you, that what i am doing is not arbitrary but unique and useful. I know the immediate inclination is to doubt what I am doing. That is expected.. and understandable.. But human nature is unpredictable. And you never know when you can learn new things and be completely shocked at someones EXTREMELY insane ideas.. I like going against the norm..
Understand the application of my modeling technique is not traditional by any means. It is theoretical in nature, and 100% experimentally designed and applied by me as we continue this insane experiment day after day.. It was not built for financial analysis, at all. I have literally 0 background in trading, TA's or anything to do with accounting or the stock market. It is being applied, through intuitive and creative means for fun so I could keep up with Bitcoin 1.34% 13.88% -0.55% 2.03% and Ethereum 2.17% 12.38% -0.47% 3.69% personally, and invest for myself.. I promise I will make many mistakes making these non-traditional TA's, or even incorrectly use traditional tools and indicators. That is the fun of it, to learn from scratch and apply another idea to a realm unknown to you. This realm is an unknown to me. A knowledge acquisition process. One i am quite enjoying..
Chart Legend:
Red Bubbles = the past.
Blue Bubbles = Now + the predicted future.
Yellow Bubbles = Mainframe Markers
Statistical Outliers = Emotions + and/or Market Manipulation.
Green Flags = Geometricc Convergence Indicators
Converging Geometricc indicators = DROP
Diverging Geometricc indicators = RISE
Solid Yellow Lines = Connects & Intercepts
Dotted Yellow Lines = Future connects & Intercepts
Green Symbols = Geo-Operators
LOOK FOR THE BITCOIN 1.34% TO C. BUBBLE. Bitcoin to C, is within reach!..
Model M has been formed based on a a variety of foundation lines that go back as far as Model I. This is a big deal because it shows that the previous models and their geometry are working AS INTENDED. Using historical data geometry to predict future data geometry and trend.
Bitcoin 1.34% to C. was created on 3.22.18 and was made to hit our goal zone of 9000-9200. I have kept to my goal since 3.22.18. Today it is 4.14.18. In that period of time we have rendered and successfully completed Model's A all the way to our current Model M. This has been an insane experimental journey. When i started this modeling algorithm, I had no idea it would be this effective. Nor did I have any idea, i would stumble on some very important indicators that are not in Traditional Technical Analysis .
Watch closely. If you look at the lower boundary line of Model M, there is a massive space beneath it.. I am keeping a close eye on the LB statistical outlier #28 location because there is a lot of space beneath it that is still in the mainframe bounadry of the current operator.
Many updates to this thread over the next few days.. come back for updates, if you care that is..
As always, thanks for looking!
Glitch420
The idea here is to convince you, that what i am doing is not arbitrary but unique and useful. I know the immediate inclination is to doubt what I am doing. That is expected.. and understandable.. But human nature is unpredictable. And you never know when you can learn new things and be completely shocked at someones EXTREMELY insane ideas.. I like going against the norm..
Understand the application of my modeling technique is not traditional by any means. It is theoretical in nature, and 100% experimentally designed and applied by me as we continue this insane experiment day after day.. It was not built for financial analysis, at all. I have literally 0 background in trading, TA's or anything to do with accounting or the stock market. It is being applied, through intuitive and creative means for fun so I could keep up with Bitcoin 1.34% 13.88% -0.55% 2.03% and Ethereum 2.17% 12.38% -0.47% 3.69% personally, and invest for myself.. I promise I will make many mistakes making these non-traditional TA's, or even incorrectly use traditional tools and indicators. That is the fun of it, to learn from scratch and apply another idea to a realm unknown to you. This realm is an unknown to me. A knowledge acquisition process. One i am quite enjoying..
Chart Legend:
Red Bubbles = the past.
Blue Bubbles = Now + the predicted future.
Yellow Bubbles = Mainframe Markers
Statistical Outliers = Emotions + and/or Market Manipulation.
Green Flags = Geometricc Convergence Indicators
Converging Geometricc indicators = DROP
Diverging Geometricc indicators = RISE
Solid Yellow Lines = Connects & Intercepts
Dotted Yellow Lines = Future connects & Intercepts
Green Symbols = Geo-Operators
LOOK FOR THE BITCOIN 1.34% TO C. BUBBLE. Bitcoin to C, is within reach!..
Model M has been formed based on a a variety of foundation lines that go back as far as Model I. This is a big deal because it shows that the previous models and their geometry are working AS INTENDED. Using historical data geometry to predict future data geometry and trend.
Bitcoin 1.34% to C. was created on 3.22.18 and was made to hit our goal zone of 9000-9200. I have kept to my goal since 3.22.18. Today it is 4.14.18. In that period of time we have rendered and successfully completed Model's A all the way to our current Model M. This has been an insane experimental journey. When i started this modeling algorithm, I had no idea it would be this effective. Nor did I have any idea, i would stumble on some very important indicators that are not in Traditional Technical Analysis .
Watch closely. If you look at the lower boundary line of Model M, there is a massive space beneath it.. I am keeping a close eye on the LB statistical outlier #28 location because there is a lot of space beneath it that is still in the mainframe bounadry of the current operator.
Many updates to this thread over the next few days.. come back for updates, if you care that is..
As always, thanks for looking!
Glitch420
評論:
5 min chart view.
評論:
3 min chart view.
評論:
15 min chart view.
評論:
Remember to leave some love in the form of a, 'Like'. :)
評論:
It chose the path i said it would.. sideways to a nice blast up.. (red boundary line)..
If it stays on the designated paths, we should expect a nice little drop and more sideways action. Then i have a bigger drop incoming. But we will see now wont we..
If it stays on the designated paths, we should expect a nice little drop and more sideways action. Then i have a bigger drop incoming. But we will see now wont we..
評論:
I moved the Predicted UB outlier over a little because the current trend is higher in the model, and if we keep pushing upwards, our exit out of Model M will be a little t the left.
評論:
zooming in, I see some boundary lines giving some direction.. (red boundary lines).
評論:
3 min chart view, you can see a few paths i made.
Down looks tastier then up right now.
but I have no idea.. My model sequence does, but I do not..
Down looks tastier then up right now.
but I have no idea.. My model sequence does, but I do not..
評論:
Gets all warm and fuzzy inside..
評論:
If you zoom out you can see why all my bubbles make perfect sense..
評論:
1 min chart view. I found a few boundary lines. Kinda have mixed indicators, but a squeeze up looks juicy.. but i think we will test the lower boundary at some point.
評論:
Mcblasty mcblastertons?...
評論:
sine line synchronization.
評論:
Well we missed that path blast path, so now we must test the down arrow i had put awhile ago. This may be kind of brutal whichever way it goes.. but indicator here says down.. sooooooooooo take it for what it's worth.
評論:
hmmhmmm highly suspicious!
評論:
Still looks suspicious as shit..
things are lining up pretty strange.
things are lining up pretty strange.
評論:
評論:
upwards maybe?
評論:
So indecisive today!!
評論:
Honestly.. i am going to look for a zone of suppression, this smells of suppression. Most likely wrong but lets check just in case.. A drop still makes sense..
評論:
sideways action for days.. trend just chillen on the lower boundary ..
評論:
HOLY FUCK LB statistical Outlier #28 is HIGH PROBABILITY. 0_o
評論:
Wow.. we now have an entire zone dedicated to this statistical outlier..
The lowest target with staying in the outlier zone is 7300.... I HIGHLY doubt we would hit that.. But i do NOT doubt, that we may end up in this massive Statistical Outlier Zone.. If we do get into this zone.. expect insane price movements.
It is extra interesting how we dropped that hard that fast. Then Model M has over a 1000$ drop zone for Statistical Outlier #28.. Lets see how this plays out..
The lowest target with staying in the outlier zone is 7300.... I HIGHLY doubt we would hit that.. But i do NOT doubt, that we may end up in this massive Statistical Outlier Zone.. If we do get into this zone.. expect insane price movements.
It is extra interesting how we dropped that hard that fast. Then Model M has over a 1000$ drop zone for Statistical Outlier #28.. Lets see how this plays out..
評論:
I got a hunch.. This zone would be PERFECT for BIG BUYERS. a massive dump to initiate FUD. Then a green dildo right thru the predicted upper boundary SO #28..
If it does this.. I will be speechless..
If it does this.. I will be speechless..
評論:
I honestly think this is the perfect setup for big buyers wanting in. I am most likely wrong.... But what if i am not??..
評論:
Let the wreckoning commence..
評論:
Important bounce line is 7600 indicated by red boundary line.
Model Sequence bottom is 7350. If we go lower then the Model Sequence bottom, and fall past and STAY past the Modeling sequence boundary's; it will be considered a Model Sequence failure. At which point our modeling would end for the moment.
We have not had a model sequence failure yet. Falling and staying below 7350, will fail my model sequence at Model M. I expected model sequence failure around Model C and D. Yet here we are at Model M.
Anything above 7350 is fair game, but anything below 7600 is dangerous territory.
But what the shit do i know.. I have been doing this for about 3 weeks now!
Lets see what happens ehh?
Model Sequence bottom is 7350. If we go lower then the Model Sequence bottom, and fall past and STAY past the Modeling sequence boundary's; it will be considered a Model Sequence failure. At which point our modeling would end for the moment.
We have not had a model sequence failure yet. Falling and staying below 7350, will fail my model sequence at Model M. I expected model sequence failure around Model C and D. Yet here we are at Model M.
Anything above 7350 is fair game, but anything below 7600 is dangerous territory.
But what the shit do i know.. I have been doing this for about 3 weeks now!
Lets see what happens ehh?
