This is a bias idea. I purposely look for a potential way that Bitcoin could have ended and could never reach $100,000. Wave Structure wise, this analysis conforms to all the rules of Elliott Wave so even though it is bias, it is valid structurally.
There are 2 things that is not ideal in this wave count:
1. Primary wave 3 (black number) has a truncated 5th sub-wave.
2. Primary wave 5's sub-wave 3 (green wave) has a sub-wave 5 that is extended instead of sub-wave 3.
Take note that while these are irregular occurrences, they are valid and allowed in Elliott Waves.
Perhaps the most important thing in this analysis is that wave 5's subwave 5 = subwave 1 (see blue Fibonacci Extension).
免責聲明
這些資訊和出版物並不意味著也不構成TradingView提供或認可的金融、投資、交易或其他類型的意見或建議。請在
使用條款閱讀更多資訊。
免責聲明
這些資訊和出版物並不意味著也不構成TradingView提供或認可的金融、投資、交易或其他類型的意見或建議。請在
使用條款閱讀更多資訊。