My apologies to my readers. I labeled the "make-or-break" point incorrectly. I have corrected it in this update. But I had forgotten I had already pointed this out in my original post. Ooops!
But while I'm at it and not to waste some good writing space, the reason why that is my "make-or-break" point is that it is at that point that price action will force me to re-evaluate my wave count since I already labeled wave (2) as completed, prices cannot very well go back above that point or else wave (2) isn't wave (2).
But while I'm at it and not to waste some good writing space, the reason why that is my "make-or-break" point is that it is at that point that price action will force me to re-evaluate my wave count since I already labeled wave (2) as completed, prices cannot very well go back above that point or else wave (2) isn't wave (2).
SPECIAL Report on the S&P 500. Read it here. It's FREE: bit.ly/2KGJ409spx818
Mailing list: bit.ly/2iNieEY
Facebook Group: facebook.com/efxselect
Twitter: @andrewefxselect
Website: efxselect.com
Mailing list: bit.ly/2iNieEY
Facebook Group: facebook.com/efxselect
Twitter: @andrewefxselect
Website: efxselect.com
相關出版品
免責聲明
這些資訊和出版物並不意味著也不構成TradingView提供或認可的金融、投資、交易或其他類型的意見或建議。請在使用條款閱讀更多資訊。
SPECIAL Report on the S&P 500. Read it here. It's FREE: bit.ly/2KGJ409spx818
Mailing list: bit.ly/2iNieEY
Facebook Group: facebook.com/efxselect
Twitter: @andrewefxselect
Website: efxselect.com
Mailing list: bit.ly/2iNieEY
Facebook Group: facebook.com/efxselect
Twitter: @andrewefxselect
Website: efxselect.com
相關出版品
免責聲明
這些資訊和出版物並不意味著也不構成TradingView提供或認可的金融、投資、交易或其他類型的意見或建議。請在使用條款閱讀更多資訊。