This analysis is provided by Eden Bradfeld at BlackBull Research.
Unilever is one of those stocks I’m aware of but have never had much interest in — it’s a large conglomerate that makes very boring things, like Dove soap (they also make Ben and Jerry’s ice cream). However, the great thing with boring companies is that they’re fairly predictable — if you think about companies that are inevitables, I guess Unilever is one of them.
The stock has done nothing for five years. The company had Paul Polman as CEO from 2009 – 2019, and the company did very well. After Polman stepped down the company entered into stagnation. There was nothing wrong with the company, per se – it just stagnated, and margins were largely boosted by price increases rather than organic growth. There was also the mistaken pushback to Polman’s “woke” ethos – from 2009 – 2019 the company roughly quadrupled in value. Subsequent management did not do this. “Woke”, works, in this context – Ben and Jerry’s has been one of Unilever’s fastest growing brands.
What are the catalysts to buy this company now?
1) New CEO. Fernando Fernandez – described as a “human tornado”. He has a mandate from the board to turnaround the company, which includes spinning off divisions.
2) The big issue here is the food division – it’s lower margin and on a peer basis is valued at a lower multiple. We need to start there.
3) The company has signalled it intends to spin-off its ice-cream unit, likely as a new company. The ice-cream unit renders around ~8bn in sales, and holds a 20% market share globally. That’s value, and the new co should list at a +2x revenue multiple, which implies a +16bn EUR valuation (analyst estimates are around +18bn)
4) I believe the market doesn’t truly value the ice-cream unit as it stands (as part of a conglomerate). Much like the listing of UMG (ex-Vivendi), I expect this implies +10bn upside.
5) You can find comparators with other consumer spin-offs, like Haleon and Kenvue – Haleon has appreciated +29% since listing, while Kevnue has appreciated +25% in the past year.
6) Management’s metrics are tied to indicators I like, like ROIC (Return on Invested Capital). Under Polman, Unilever had a +18% ROIC. It currently sits at 11% or so. If management can move the needle on this (by divesting, focusing, and leveraging their highly profitable units), then shareholders will see the compounding virtue of ROI.
I still have some pause — it isn’t that cheap for the UK market, so you need to consider the differential between the US (and those US listed consumer companies) and the UK. Then again — if you consider the spin-off of the ice cream business reducing the lower-margin food business portion of Unilever’s revenue down to about 22%, then there’s a case to be made for multiple revaluation…
免責聲明
這些資訊和出版物並不意味著也不構成TradingView提供或認可的金融、投資、交易或其他類型的意見或建議。請在
使用條款閱讀更多資訊。
免責聲明
這些資訊和出版物並不意味著也不構成TradingView提供或認可的金融、投資、交易或其他類型的意見或建議。請在
使用條款閱讀更多資訊。