INVITE-ONLY SCRIPT
Bitcoin Value Capture Heatmap
已更新
BTC Value Capture Heatmap answers a question originally posed by Willy Woo:
"How much pressure on Bitcoin's market cap does one dollar of purchasing power exert?"
The higher the print, the more market cap grows per dollar invested -- adjusted for global M2 growth.
Bitcoin Value Capture Heatmap = ( market cap / global M2 ) / realized cap
A NOVEL INGREDIENT REVEALS A UNIQUE USE CASE
Adjusting bitcoin's market cap for global M2 growth sharpens a legacy metric with a normalizing factor that 'stabilizes' its view across cycles.
The metric peaked at identical levels (4.2), three bitcoin bull markets in a row. On the same day bitcoin price volatility peaked for the cycle, every time.
One might naturally expect this to coincide with cycle tops. But it doesn't.
It precede's cycle's tops: in a consistent, very specific way, that predisposing a unique use case.
BITCOIN'S VOLATILTY TOP
The metric's true use case only comes into clear focus when paired with an unrelated insight:
Whether in distribution (in Spring 2021) or a parabolic blow off top (2017 & 2013), each of the last 3 bitcoin cycle tops shows tight consistent adherence to the Wykoff Distribution Schematic.
"But Wykoff schematics apply to distribution tops, not to blow off tops."
A closer look at the last 15-20 years of parabolic blow off tops, across all asset classes, viewed through a Wykoff lens, reveals recurring tight adherence to Wykoff's Distribution Schematic.
Including (and especially) BTC's parabolic top in Dec 2017; BTC's parabolic top in 2013; and ETH's blow off top in Jan 2018.
In our age of automation, this makes sense. Wykoff's schematics mirror the timeless archetypal goal of his 'Composite Operator': max pain for all other market participants.
A process that lends itself to automation, optimized a bit more each passing year.
Peak cycle volatility maps directly to the Wykoff Distribution Schematic's 'Buying Climax'.
An event that preceded parabolic cycle tops, by about 2 weeks.
Future BTC parabolas (should they recur) would come at exponentially higher market caps, so they may take longer to unfold -- I don't take the 2 week pattern too seriously.
But Parabolic Distribution as an emergent archetypal market structure is likely encoded.
PUTTING IT ALL TOGETHER
Bitcoin Value Capture Heatmap signals peak cycle volatility, on a daily close of 4.2 on the metric's Y axis. It has never reached that level twice in the same cycle.
Awareness that:
(a) peak volatility for the cycle has likely been reached, and
(b) peak volatility has a history of tightly preceding bitcoin cycle tops, can
(c) empowers traders with a data-driven 'guide post' to their likely exactly location in an increasingly archetypal topping process.
SPECIFIC USES IN AN EXIT STRATEGY
When the Heatmap's signal level is reached, one might (for instance):
* Hedge, since bitcoin is likely closing in on its cycle top, OR
* Start to DCA out, over a pre-planned time period OR
* Rotate up the risk curve, since BTC probably doesn't have much upside left, OR
* Wait for acceptance one leg higher, which (consistent with Wykoff logic) is the likeliest place to expect an actual cycle top.
Though the ratio (in the past) touched 4.2 each cycle, a closer look shows subtly lower peaks per cycle, like most other on-chain cycle oscillators.
Extrapolating out, one might expect bitcoin's next top on volatility to print on any touch of 4.0 or higher.
Or one might give it more room to run, consistent with record institutiional flows this cycle.
Alerts are enabled for both options.
The metric works on any timeframe, but should only be used on the 1D chart.
"How much pressure on Bitcoin's market cap does one dollar of purchasing power exert?"
The higher the print, the more market cap grows per dollar invested -- adjusted for global M2 growth.
Bitcoin Value Capture Heatmap = ( market cap / global M2 ) / realized cap
A NOVEL INGREDIENT REVEALS A UNIQUE USE CASE
Adjusting bitcoin's market cap for global M2 growth sharpens a legacy metric with a normalizing factor that 'stabilizes' its view across cycles.
The metric peaked at identical levels (4.2), three bitcoin bull markets in a row. On the same day bitcoin price volatility peaked for the cycle, every time.
One might naturally expect this to coincide with cycle tops. But it doesn't.
It precede's cycle's tops: in a consistent, very specific way, that predisposing a unique use case.
BITCOIN'S VOLATILTY TOP
The metric's true use case only comes into clear focus when paired with an unrelated insight:
Whether in distribution (in Spring 2021) or a parabolic blow off top (2017 & 2013), each of the last 3 bitcoin cycle tops shows tight consistent adherence to the Wykoff Distribution Schematic.
"But Wykoff schematics apply to distribution tops, not to blow off tops."
A closer look at the last 15-20 years of parabolic blow off tops, across all asset classes, viewed through a Wykoff lens, reveals recurring tight adherence to Wykoff's Distribution Schematic.
Including (and especially) BTC's parabolic top in Dec 2017; BTC's parabolic top in 2013; and ETH's blow off top in Jan 2018.
In our age of automation, this makes sense. Wykoff's schematics mirror the timeless archetypal goal of his 'Composite Operator': max pain for all other market participants.
A process that lends itself to automation, optimized a bit more each passing year.
Peak cycle volatility maps directly to the Wykoff Distribution Schematic's 'Buying Climax'.
An event that preceded parabolic cycle tops, by about 2 weeks.
Future BTC parabolas (should they recur) would come at exponentially higher market caps, so they may take longer to unfold -- I don't take the 2 week pattern too seriously.
But Parabolic Distribution as an emergent archetypal market structure is likely encoded.
PUTTING IT ALL TOGETHER
Bitcoin Value Capture Heatmap signals peak cycle volatility, on a daily close of 4.2 on the metric's Y axis. It has never reached that level twice in the same cycle.
Awareness that:
(a) peak volatility for the cycle has likely been reached, and
(b) peak volatility has a history of tightly preceding bitcoin cycle tops, can
(c) empowers traders with a data-driven 'guide post' to their likely exactly location in an increasingly archetypal topping process.
SPECIFIC USES IN AN EXIT STRATEGY
When the Heatmap's signal level is reached, one might (for instance):
* Hedge, since bitcoin is likely closing in on its cycle top, OR
* Start to DCA out, over a pre-planned time period OR
* Rotate up the risk curve, since BTC probably doesn't have much upside left, OR
* Wait for acceptance one leg higher, which (consistent with Wykoff logic) is the likeliest place to expect an actual cycle top.
Though the ratio (in the past) touched 4.2 each cycle, a closer look shows subtly lower peaks per cycle, like most other on-chain cycle oscillators.
Extrapolating out, one might expect bitcoin's next top on volatility to print on any touch of 4.0 or higher.
Or one might give it more room to run, consistent with record institutiional flows this cycle.
Alerts are enabled for both options.
The metric works on any timeframe, but should only be used on the 1D chart.
發行說明
Minor settings update. Script output unaffected.發行說明
Minor code update, to remove the need for product keys. 僅限邀請腳本
僅限作者授權的用戶訪問此腳本，並且通常需要付費。您可以將其增加到收藏腳本中，但是只有在向作者請求並獲得許可之後，才能使用它。 請聯繫AlchemicalIntel以了解更多信息，或按照下面作者的說明進行操作。
TradingView 不建議購買並使用此腳本，除非您 100% 信任其作者並了解腳本的工作原理。在許多情況下，您可以在我們的社群腳本中免費找到良好的開源替代方案。
作者的說明
″Access to this script comes included with the Bull Market Top Playbook at https://www.alchemicalintel.com
想在圖表上使用此腳本？
警告：請閱讀，然後再請求訪問權限。
Access to all private scripts comes included with purchase of the Bull Market Top Playbook at alchemicalintel.com
免責聲明
這些資訊和出版物並不意味著也不構成TradingView提供或認可的金融、投資、交易或其他類型的意見或建議。請在使用條款閱讀更多資訊。