1 ON 1 FRACTAL CONTRAST VS 2008 CORRECTION.
Notes:
1. This is not a "regression" fractal, and let me explain why.
2. If you look at 2008, price was crushed under the orange wave (ending in 2200 days)
3. It's not even close here, bc a similar correction would put us at 1350.
4. From a volume point of view, we stronger than THE RECOVERY TO 1040 IN LATE 2009.
5. NOT IN THE SAME BALL PARK.
Notes:
1. This is not a "regression" fractal, and let me explain why.
2. If you look at 2008, price was crushed under the orange wave (ending in 2200 days)
3. It's not even close here, bc a similar correction would put us at 1350.
4. From a volume point of view, we stronger than THE RECOVERY TO 1040 IN LATE 2009.
5. NOT IN THE SAME BALL PARK.
註釋
6. A great question would be: why would this NOT BE COMPARABLE TO VOLUME SITUATION IN LATE JULY AND AUGUST OF 2008?A: The dark gray volume wave in 2008 was OUT OF POSITION BY JUNE. Meaning since it's periodic value is roughly 1/3 of the dark navy/purple wave, it should be higher in a bull market. Because it ends in roughly 1 trading year, IT TAKES A LONG TINE FOR THIS PROCESS TO OCCUR. For that to happen now, it would take us another 18 months for this happen, IF it even happens.
註釋
*typo* LONG TIME
免責聲明
這些資訊和出版物並不意味著也不構成TradingView提供或認可的金融、投資、交易或其他類型的意見或建議。請在使用條款閱讀更多資訊。
免責聲明
這些資訊和出版物並不意味著也不構成TradingView提供或認可的金融、投資、交易或其他類型的意見或建議。請在使用條款閱讀更多資訊。