I am really excited about this one. I only had time to run it 4 times, but three of them with help from trend configuration fractals that answered why one price path was different from another.
I cannot improve the quality of this map (#2/100), from a technical skill standpoint (besides repeating a process over and over for a better poll).
Why? I've answered my last question I had in trend configuration today, something I wasn't even sure there is an answer to.
Which is the correct time frame (bar size) and what is the justification? The answer is, there isn't one. The only true way to significantly improve on the method is run the trend configuration against a trend configuration fractal database of all available time frames with higher values for longer time frames. So the edge is in computing power and software engineering. Essentially: define the conditions, and have computing power observe at least 27 different time frames, match against database, project the imminent future each time, then average that. Perfect modeling - or something close to it - requires institutional funding for software engineers and computing power.
Not surprising, no. Annoying and frustrated, yes.
Anyway, enjoy this one.
I cannot improve the quality of this map (#2/100), from a technical skill standpoint (besides repeating a process over and over for a better poll).
Why? I've answered my last question I had in trend configuration today, something I wasn't even sure there is an answer to.
Which is the correct time frame (bar size) and what is the justification? The answer is, there isn't one. The only true way to significantly improve on the method is run the trend configuration against a trend configuration fractal database of all available time frames with higher values for longer time frames. So the edge is in computing power and software engineering. Essentially: define the conditions, and have computing power observe at least 27 different time frames, match against database, project the imminent future each time, then average that. Perfect modeling - or something close to it - requires institutional funding for software engineers and computing power.
Not surprising, no. Annoying and frustrated, yes.
Anyway, enjoy this one.
註釋
Great quote I know:"Risking everything can be risky. If you fail, you can lose everything." - Q. Pham
註釋
Question: Can we hit all time highs??Answer: GC1! can, 1940. XAUUSD always gets cheated in these situations, so maybe 1895.
註釋
***** REGRESSED BOLLINGERS ARE THE REAL DEAL, BUT NEED AT LEAST 3 OR 4 ***** IT IS UNREAL WHAT IT ALLOWS YOU TO ANTICIPATE.
註釋
Some food for thought:註釋
註釋
註釋
註釋
註釋
OOPS.. THAT LAST CHART WAS SUPPOSED TO GO AFTER THIS NEXT CHART註釋
註釋
90 DAY OUTLINE W/O CLEANUP FOR SALVANOST註釋
I've just re-realized something. I'm supposed to to do full count bottoms up (meaning longer term first, foundation first). Not top down. So here is 6-month look with bottoms up method. 註釋
註釋
SAT 6/20 4:50 PM. I CANT EVEN BEGIN TO DESCRIBE HOW REALLY EXCITED I AM ABOUT THIS ONE. IF WE GET THAT 1780 AND 1735 SWING, THE R/R FOR 1875 IS OFF THE CHARTS!註釋
5:00 PM Part of the reason is how much technical skil I feel I have grasped or improved upom in the last few days. I will explain all this later.
註釋
THIS IDEA STANDS UNTIL 7/20/20. HOWEVER, FOLLOW UPDATES HERE AT MORE DETAILED TRADING GUIDE:
註釋
See it catch the drop this morning? Coincident? No.註釋
THIS IDEA CLOSES 6/26 AT CLOSE.註釋
END OF UPDATES註釋
MONDAY 6/22 6:30 PM PLEASE GO HERE FOR CHANGE OF PLANS
註釋
**** I CLOSED THAT ONE 12 HOURS LATER **** GO HERE INSTEAD:
註釋
*** I NOTED IN A DIFFERENT POST YESTERDAY THAT THIS ROUTE (THIS PAGE) WAS GAINING THE EDGE AND FAVORITE POSITION VS THE IDEA POSTED RIGHT ABOVE. ***GO HERE FOR SHORT TERM TURN-FOR-TURN FROM A WEEK AGO, ABSOLUTELY CRUSHING IT.
註釋
HERE IS THE TRADING GUIDE (THEORETICAL TO SEE IF IT WOULD WORK)註釋
So this map even though going the right way, is going to be low. Go to the map 3 charts up. It has an empty bubble after #4. It is titled trade of the year as opposed to trade of the summer.
免責聲明
這些資訊和出版物並不意味著也不構成TradingView提供或認可的金融、投資、交易或其他類型的意見或建議。請在使用條款閱讀更多資訊。
免責聲明
這些資訊和出版物並不意味著也不構成TradingView提供或認可的金融、投資、交易或其他類型的意見或建議。請在使用條款閱讀更多資訊。