This is the strategy version of "expected range STUDY". The buy and sell signals are generated with the study version, but what is displayed on the chart is different. Here, the PnL of each trade is shown on the chart, as well as the peak profit point of each trade up till the present. Black areas represent take profit and waiting for the next trade to start. Green = long. Red = short. Set to take profit at 53% and stoploss is set to -7%. Having a stoploss trigger does not put a black area on the chart. For the XBTUSD 2 hour chart, but use it however you like on whatever chart for backtesting.
Enjoy. Don't get rekt. A good backtest doesn't mean a good forward test. Use at your own risk.
Enjoy. Don't get rekt. A good backtest doesn't mean a good forward test. Use at your own risk.
發布通知:
Just a small tweak to a small bug in the expected range STRATEGY. There was a bug in the strategy tester where the minimum number of contracts to trade was set to 1, and 1 contract was equal to the price of Bitcoin. The initial capital was set to 1000. So if the first long signal was bought at $15000, it would buy $15000 worth, which is 15x leverage essentially, and that isn't right. The leverage remained high like this until the capital earned exceeded the Bitcoin price in the backtest. I set it so the minimum amount to trade to .000001 contracts (or the Bitcoin price multiplied by .000001) which should fix the problem.
I also added a backtesting range, so you can test this strategy in isolated time ranges.
I apologize for releasing this strategy with the slightly misleading backtest results. I was unaware until someone pointed out the bug to me recently. Again, thank you to the diligent community here for pointing out the error. The results are still good, just a little less good, but still very good. I think on the 2h chart the profit factor has changed from somewhere just over 4 to 3.937.
-Jomy
I also added a backtesting range, so you can test this strategy in isolated time ranges.
I apologize for releasing this strategy with the slightly misleading backtest results. I was unaware until someone pointed out the bug to me recently. Again, thank you to the diligent community here for pointing out the error. The results are still good, just a little less good, but still very good. I think on the 2h chart the profit factor has changed from somewhere just over 4 to 3.937.
-Jomy