nukenowakowski
看多

BTC -- Wychoff Accumulation Test

COINBASE:BTCUSD   比特幣 / 美元
Howdy Yall!

It was time to take a look at the accumulation test for Wychoff events. Without doing a formal count on a strength test (Why would I with modern Relative Strength Indicators, and a passing accumulation indicator?) I have utilized all of the important tests for accumulation of an asset by Wychoff onto this chart. Obviously some don't count, as many readers know. Being as BTC             IS the index -- and market cap in crypto is NOT an accurate measurement, I have placed the tests on the right side.

I'm long. I'll remain in the long category, but we must raise an eyebrow at the fact that we have not had a secondary test of this phase. We have passed all of the tests, but one of the subtests is a secondary test in THIS phase. If we are to assume we have entered a new phase, we should have supplied a secondary test. I don't see one. It appears as though the rest of the tests have passed.

I hope you take a look, make it yours, and make your own assessment.
交易進行: It appears as though, the market gave us our secondary test.
Go figure huh?

I've added it to the chart. How fun is it that the secondary test happened right on my x mark? (coincidence, I didn't guess that at all!)

Enjoy peeps! I'm still bullish :)
Are you still bullish? I think there is one more test left by the end of this month or early April.
回覆
@Acel, Yes I am. I'm bullish - long term buy, and hold on BTC.
回覆
great,
I agree, this is first AR. I'm waiting for ST and then all in :)
回覆
@Jour,
Good call. You got your wish!
回覆
can you elaborate about the secondary test and what it does? Are there ways to assume this test based on current data.
回覆
@us.ira90, So a secondary test is a test of the local support. IF we truly entered a new phase with a Primary support, and a decent secondary support, THEN in Wyckoff's accumulation tests there is a subtest which looks for a "secondary test" of that support. At this point in time we do not have that secondary test. Now notice that this is a subtest - it is not absolutely "required" in this method. With that said, I must say that more often than not there is a secondary test. We may not get one here. Its always something to keep an eye on. This is why in todays video I specifically added in the writeup what method I would use for market entrance.

Regards friend!
回覆
maxband nukenowakowski
@nukenowakowski, Great thanks for your work!
回覆
Thanks for your work
回覆
@vertigoa, Absolutely. I'm glad you could take something from it, and thank you for taking the time to leave a comment! It is very much appreciated!
回覆
This is no Wyckoff.
回覆
ZH 繁體中文
EN English
EN English (UK)
EN English (IN)
DE Deutsch
FR Français
ES Español
IT Italiano
PL Polski
SV Svenska
TR Türkçe
RU Русский
PT Português
ID Bahasa Indonesia
MS Bahasa Melayu
TH ภาษาไทย
VI Tiếng Việt
JA 日本語
KO 한국어
ZH 简体中文
AR العربية
首頁 股票篩選器 外匯篩選器 加密貨幣篩選器 全球財經日曆 如何運作 圖表功能 網站規則 版主 網站 & 經紀商解決方案 小工具 圖表庫 功能請求 部落格 & 新聞 常見問題 幫助 & 維基 推特
個人檔案 個人檔案設定 帳戶和帳單 我的事件處理號碼 聯絡客服 發表的想法 粉絲 正在關注 私人訊息 在線聊天 登出